2005 Ford Taurus vs. 1982 Seat Ritmo

To start off, 2005 Ford Taurus is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Seat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Seat Ritmo would be higher. At 2,999 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Taurus (201 HP) has 138 more horse power than 1982 Seat Ritmo. (63 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1982 Seat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Taurus weights approximately 625 kg more than 1982 Seat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Taurus (250 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Seat Ritmo. (92 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Seat Ritmo. 2005 Ford Taurus has automatic transmission and 1982 Seat Ritmo has manual transmission. 1982 Seat Ritmo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Ford Taurus will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: