2005 Ford Taurus vs. 2008 Mazda Rustler
To start off, 2008 Mazda Rustler is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Taurus weights approximately 284 kg more than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Taurus (266 Nm) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Rustler. (120 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Taurus | 2008 Mazda Rustler | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Taurus | Rustler |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
| Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1586 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 266 Nm | 120 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1014 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 54 L |
