2005 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1962 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2005 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 3,933 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Thunderbird (280 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 242 more horse power than 1962 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1962 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 1322 kg more than 1962 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Thunderbird | 1962 Lotus Seven | |
Make | Ford | Lotus |
Model | Thunderbird | Seven |
Year Released | 2005 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3933 cc | 997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 280 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 29 L |