2005 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2005 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,932 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Thunderbird (280 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (130 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 517 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Thunderbird (388 Nm) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Thunderbird | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Thunderbird | 2000 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3932 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 280 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 198 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 95 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1712 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2700 mm |