2005 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1970 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2005 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 3,932 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1970 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Thunderbird | 1970 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Thunderbird | Colt |
Year Released | 2005 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3932 cc | 1497 cc |
Horse Power | 280 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |