2005 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1994 Mercury Villager
To start off, 2005 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 3,933 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Thunderbird (280 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1994 Mercury Villager. (149 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1994 Mercury Villager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mercury Villager weights approximately 48 kg more than 2005 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 2005 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Thunderbird | 1994 Mercury Villager | |
Make | Ford | Mercury |
Model | Thunderbird | Villager |
Year Released | 2005 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3933 cc | 2958 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 280 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2860 mm |