2005 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1995 Mercury Villager
To start off, 2005 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 3,932 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Thunderbird (280 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1995 Mercury Villager. (149 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1995 Mercury Villager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mercury Villager weights approximately 88 kg more than 2005 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 2005 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Thunderbird | 1995 Mercury Villager | |
Make | Ford | Mercury |
Model | Thunderbird | Villager |
Year Released | 2005 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3932 cc | 2960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 280 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1712 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2860 mm |