2005 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1999 Rover 25
To start off, 2005 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Rover 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Rover 25 would be higher. At 3,932 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Thunderbird (280 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1999 Rover 25. (104 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1999 Rover 25. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 582 kg more than 1999 Rover 25. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Rover 25, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Thunderbird (388 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Rover 25. (240 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Rover 25.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Thunderbird | 1999 Rover 25 | |
| Make | Ford | Rover |
| Model | Thunderbird | 25 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3932 cc | 1950 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 280 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 388 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 84.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 19.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1712 kg | 1130 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 50 L |
