2005 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2001 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2005 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. At 3,933 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Thunderbird (280 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 2001 Nissan X-Trail. (112 HP @ 2000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2001 Nissan X-Trail. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 152 kg more than 2001 Nissan X-Trail. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Thunderbird (388 Nm) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Nissan X-Trail. (270 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Nissan X-Trail.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Thunderbird | 2001 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Thunderbird | X-Trail |
Year Released | 2005 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3933 cc | 2184 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 280 HP | 112 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 270 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 16.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1600 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |