2005 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2002 Volvo C70
To start off, 2005 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Volvo C70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Volvo C70 would be higher. At 3,933 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Thunderbird (280 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 2002 Volvo C70. (162 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2002 Volvo C70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 352 kg more than 2002 Volvo C70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Thunderbird (388 Nm) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Volvo C70. (230 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Thunderbird | 2002 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Thunderbird | C70 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3933 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 280 HP | 162 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 230 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 68 L |