2005 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2007 Mercedes-Benz CL
To start off, 2007 Mercedes-Benz CL is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,461 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Mercedes-Benz CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mercedes-Benz CL (382 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 2005 Ford Thunderbird. (280 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mercedes-Benz CL should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Thunderbird.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mercedes-Benz CL (530 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Thunderbird. (388 Nm). This means 2007 Mercedes-Benz CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Thunderbird.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Thunderbird | 2007 Mercedes-Benz CL | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Thunderbird | CL |
Year Released | 2005 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3932 cc | 5461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 280 HP | 382 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 530 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 98 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 90.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 10.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.8 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 15.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 90 L |