2005 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2008 Renault Scenic
To start off, 2008 Renault Scenic is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 3,933 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 212 kg more than 2008 Renault Scenic.
Because 2008 Renault Scenic is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Renault Scenic will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Thunderbird (388 Nm) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Scenic. (188 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Scenic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Thunderbird | 2008 Renault Scenic | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Thunderbird | Scenic |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3933 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 280 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 388 Nm | 188 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 9.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |