2005 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2012 Chevrolet Rezzo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Rezzo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 3,933 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Thunderbird (280 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Rezzo. (103 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 405 kg more than 2012 Chevrolet Rezzo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Rezzo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Thunderbird (388 Nm) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Rezzo. (142 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Thunderbird | 2012 Chevrolet Rezzo | |
Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
Model | Thunderbird | Rezzo |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3933 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 280 HP | 103 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 142 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 81.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1347 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 8.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |