2005 Ford Transit Connect vs. 1955 Humber Super Snipe
To start off, 2005 Ford Transit Connect is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 4,138 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 114 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Humber Super Snipe weights approximately 610 kg more than 2005 Ford Transit Connect.
Because 1955 Humber Super Snipe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Humber Super Snipe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Transit Connect, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Transit Connect | 1955 Humber Super Snipe | |
| Make | Ford | Humber |
| Model | Transit Connect | Super Snipe |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1795 cc | 4138 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1890 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 5050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2950 mm |
