2005 Ford Transit Connect vs. 1982 Buick Century
To start off, 2005 Ford Transit Connect is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Buick Century. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Buick Century would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Buick Century is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Transit Connect (114 HP) has 4 more horse power than 1982 Buick Century. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Transit Connect should accelerate faster than 1982 Buick Century.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Buick Century (197 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Transit Connect. (160 Nm). This means 1982 Buick Century will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Transit Connect.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Transit Connect | 1982 Buick Century | |
| Make | Ford | Buick |
| Model | Transit Connect | Century |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
| Body Type | Panel Van | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1795 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 110 HP |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 197 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4849 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1763 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1374 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2664 mm |
