2005 Ford Transit Connect vs. 1995 Mercury Villager
To start off, 2005 Ford Transit Connect is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mercury Villager (149 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2005 Ford Transit Connect. (114 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Transit Connect. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mercury Villager weights approximately 520 kg more than 2005 Ford Transit Connect. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Transit Connect | 1995 Mercury Villager | |
Make | Ford | Mercury |
Model | Transit Connect | Villager |
Year Released | 2005 | 1995 |
Body Type | Panel Van | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1795 cc | 2960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2860 mm |