2005 GMC Canyon vs. 1972 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2005 GMC Canyon is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,768 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Canyon (175 HP) has 57 more horse power than 1972 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Canyon weights approximately 700 kg more than 1972 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 GMC Canyon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Mazda RX-2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 GMC Canyon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Canyon (251 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Canyon | 1972 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | GMC | Mazda |
Model | Canyon | RX-2 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2768 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 157 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1660 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2480 mm |