2005 GMC Canyon vs. 1982 Renault 9

To start off, 2005 GMC Canyon is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 9 would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Canyon (175 HP) has 128 more horse power than 1982 Renault 9. (47 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Canyon weights approximately 908 kg more than 1982 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Compare all specifications:

2005 GMC Canyon 1982 Renault 9
Make GMC Renault
Model Canyon 9
Year Released 2005 1982
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2770 cc 1108 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 175 HP 47 HP
Engine Bore Size 93.1 mm 70 mm
Engine Stroke Size 102 mm 72 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 9.2:1
Number of Seats 3 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1730 kg 822 kg
Vehicle Length 4890 mm 4070 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1670 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2830 mm 2610 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 10.2 L/100km 8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 72 L 38 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]