2005 GMC Canyon vs. 1986 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2005 GMC Canyon is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 3,458 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Canyon (220 HP) has 161 more horse power than 1986 Nissan Pulsar. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 1986 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Canyon weights approximately 1014 kg more than 1986 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 GMC Canyon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Nissan Pulsar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 GMC Canyon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Canyon (305 Nm) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Nissan Pulsar. (97 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Canyon | 1986 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | GMC | Nissan |
Model | Canyon | Pulsar |
Year Released | 2005 | 1986 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3458 cc | 1270 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 97 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1894 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2420 mm |