2005 GMC Canyon vs. 2002 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2005 GMC Canyon is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Nissan X-Trail (177 HP) has 2 more horse power than 2005 GMC Canyon. (175 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Canyon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Canyon weights approximately 280 kg more than 2002 Nissan X-Trail.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Canyon (251 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Nissan X-Trail. (245 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Nissan X-Trail.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 GMC Canyon | 2002 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | GMC | Nissan |
| Model | Canyon | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2770 cc | 2487 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 177 HP |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 245 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1730 kg | 1450 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 60 L |
