2005 GMC Canyon vs. 2003 Renault Scenic II
To start off, 2005 GMC Canyon is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Renault Scenic II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Renault Scenic II would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Canyon (175 HP) has 79 more horse power than 2003 Renault Scenic II. (96 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Scenic II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Canyon weights approximately 482 kg more than 2003 Renault Scenic II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Canyon (252 Nm) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Scenic II. (127 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Scenic II.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Canyon | 2003 Renault Scenic II | |
Make | GMC | Renault |
Model | Canyon | Scenic II |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Body Type | Pickup | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 96 HP |
Torque | 252 Nm | 127 Nm |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1797 kg | 1315 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 5.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 9.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 60 L |