2005 GMC Canyon vs. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2005 GMC Canyon is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 107 more horse power than 2005 GMC Canyon. (175 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Canyon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 718 kg more than 2005 GMC Canyon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (440 Nm) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 GMC Canyon. (252 Nm). This means 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Canyon | 2004 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | GMC | Land Rover |
Model | Canyon | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 4398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 282 HP |
Torque | 252 Nm | 440 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 92.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 82.7 mm |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1797 kg | 2515 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 100 L |