2005 GMC Canyon vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL
To start off, 2005 GMC Canyon is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL (302 HP) has 127 more horse power than 2005 GMC Canyon. (175 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Canyon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL weights approximately 135 kg more than 2005 GMC Canyon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL (460 Nm) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 GMC Canyon. (251 Nm). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Canyon | 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL | |
Make | GMC | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Canyon | CL |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 4966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 302 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 460 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 97 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1730 kg | 1865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.7 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 99 L |