2005 GMC Canyon vs. 2004 Rover 75
To start off, 2005 GMC Canyon is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Rover 75 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Rover 75 (256 HP) has 36 more horse power than 2005 GMC Canyon. (220 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Canyon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Canyon weights approximately 154 kg more than 2004 Rover 75.
Because 2005 GMC Canyon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Rover 75. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 GMC Canyon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Rover 75 (410 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 GMC Canyon. (305 Nm). This means 2004 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Canyon | 2004 Rover 75 | |
Make | GMC | Rover |
Model | Canyon | 75 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3458 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 256 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 410 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 90.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 90 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1894 kg | 1740 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 10.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 18.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 13.4 L/100km |