2005 GMC Canyon vs. 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee (235 HP) has 60 more horse power than 2005 GMC Canyon. (175 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Canyon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Canyon weights approximately 53 kg more than 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee (415 Nm) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 GMC Canyon. (251 Nm). This means 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Canyon | 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | GMC | Jeep |
Model | Canyon | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 4703 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 235 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 415 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 101 mm |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1730 kg | 1677 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.7 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 78 L |