2005 GMC Canyon vs. 2006 Renault Grand Scenic
To start off, 2006 Renault Grand Scenic is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Canyon (175 HP) has 42 more horse power than 2006 Renault Grand Scenic. (133 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Grand Scenic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Canyon weights approximately 30 kg more than 2006 Renault Grand Scenic. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Canyon (251 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Grand Scenic. (191 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Grand Scenic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Canyon | 2006 Renault Grand Scenic | |
Make | GMC | Renault |
Model | Canyon | Grand Scenic |
Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
Body Type | Pickup | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 133 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 191 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 82.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 11.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1730 kg | 1700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 8.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 60 L |