2005 GMC Canyon vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLC
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLC is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLC (181 HP) has 6 more horse power than 2005 GMC Canyon. (175 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLC should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Canyon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Canyon weights approximately 265 kg more than 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLC.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Canyon (251 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLC. (250 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLC.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Canyon | 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLC | |
Make | GMC | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Canyon | CLC |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 1795 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 181 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 250 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1730 kg | 1465 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 62 L |