2005 GMC Canyon vs. 2009 Nissan Murano
To start off, 2009 Nissan Murano is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Murano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Murano (265 HP) has 90 more horse power than 2005 GMC Canyon. (175 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Murano should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Canyon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Canyon weights approximately 237 kg more than 2009 Nissan Murano.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan Murano (336 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 GMC Canyon. (252 Nm). This means 2009 Nissan Murano will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Canyon | 2009 Nissan Murano | |
Make | GMC | Nissan |
Model | Canyon | Murano |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Body Type | Pickup | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 3498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 265 HP |
Torque | 252 Nm | 336 Nm |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1797 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.7 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 82 L |