2005 GMC Canyon vs. 2010 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Canyon (175 HP) has 32 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ranger. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Canyon weights approximately 350 kg more than 2010 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Canyon (252 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford Ranger. (209 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Canyon | 2010 Ford Ranger | |
Make | GMC | Ford |
Model | Canyon | Ranger |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 143 HP |
Torque | 252 Nm | 209 Nm |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1797 kg | 1447 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 5171 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 3193 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.7 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 74 L |