2005 GMC Canyon vs. 2010 Kia Optima
To start off, 2010 Kia Optima is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 175 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Canyon weights approximately 347 kg more than 2010 Kia Optima.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Canyon (252 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Kia Optima. (229 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Kia Optima.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 GMC Canyon | 2010 Kia Optima | |
| Make | GMC | Kia |
| Model | Canyon | Optima |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2770 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 175 HP |
| Torque | 252 Nm | 229 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1797 kg | 1450 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4801 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1806 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1481 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 62 L |
