2005 GMC Canyon vs. 2010 Nissan GT-R
To start off, 2010 Nissan GT-R is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Nissan GT-R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan GT-R (485 HP) has 310 more horse power than 2005 GMC Canyon. (175 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan GT-R should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Canyon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Canyon weights approximately 60 kg more than 2010 Nissan GT-R.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan GT-R (588 Nm) has 336 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 GMC Canyon. (252 Nm). This means 2010 Nissan GT-R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 GMC Canyon | 2010 Nissan GT-R | |
| Make | GMC | Nissan |
| Model | Canyon | GT-R |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2770 cc | 3800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 485 HP |
| Torque | 252 Nm | 588 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1797 kg | 1737 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4651 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1902 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1372 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2779 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.7 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 74 L |
