2005 GMC Canyon vs. 2010 Nissan Murano
To start off, 2010 Nissan Murano is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Murano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Murano (265 HP) has 45 more horse power than 2005 GMC Canyon. (220 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Murano should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Canyon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Canyon weights approximately 36 kg more than 2010 Nissan Murano.
Because 2005 GMC Canyon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Nissan Murano. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 GMC Canyon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan Murano (336 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 GMC Canyon. (305 Nm). This means 2010 Nissan Murano will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Canyon | 2010 Nissan Murano | |
Make | GMC | Nissan |
Model | Canyon | Murano |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3458 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 265 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 336 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1894 kg | 1858 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4788 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1882 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2824 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 82 L |