2005 GMC Canyon vs. 2011 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2011 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Canyon (175 HP) has 106 more horse power than 2011 Volkswagen Polo. (69 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 2011 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Canyon weights approximately 730 kg more than 2011 Volkswagen Polo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Canyon (252 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Volkswagen Polo. (112 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Canyon | 2011 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | GMC | Volkswagen |
Model | Canyon | Polo |
Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 69 HP |
Torque | 252 Nm | 112 Nm |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1797 kg | 1067 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1682 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1462 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 4.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 7.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 5.5 L/100km |