2005 GMC Canyon vs. 2012 Chevrolet Suburban
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Suburban (352 HP) has 177 more horse power than 2005 GMC Canyon. (175 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Canyon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Suburban weights approximately 993 kg more than 2005 GMC Canyon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Suburban (517 Nm) has 265 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 GMC Canyon. (252 Nm). This means 2012 Chevrolet Suburban will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Canyon | 2012 Chevrolet Suburban | |
Make | GMC | Chevrolet |
Model | Canyon | Suburban |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 352 HP |
Torque | 252 Nm | 517 Nm |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1797 kg | 2790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 5649 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2009 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1951 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 3302 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.7 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 23.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 148 L |