2005 GMC Canyon vs. 2012 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2012 Ford Mustang is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Mustang (305 HP) has 130 more horse power than 2005 GMC Canyon. (175 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Canyon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Canyon weights approximately 231 kg more than 2012 Ford Mustang.

Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Mustang (379 Nm) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 GMC Canyon. (252 Nm). This means 2012 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 GMC Canyon.

Compare all specifications:

2005 GMC Canyon 2012 Ford Mustang
Make GMC Ford
Model Canyon Mustang
Year Released 2005 2012
Body Type Pickup Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2770 cc 3700 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 175 HP 305 HP
Torque 252 Nm 379 Nm
Number of Seats 3 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1797 kg 1566 kg
Fuel Consumption Highway 8.7 L/100km 8.1 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 11.2 L/100km 12.4 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 72 L 61 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]