2005 GMC Canyon vs. 2012 Opel Combo
To start off, 2012 Opel Combo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 2,768 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Canyon (175 HP) has 86 more horse power than 2012 Opel Combo. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 2012 Opel Combo.
Because 2005 GMC Canyon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Opel Combo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 GMC Canyon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Canyon (251 Nm) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Opel Combo. (126 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Opel Combo.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Canyon | 2012 Opel Combo | |
Make | GMC | Opel |
Model | Canyon | Combo |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2768 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 126 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 73.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 80.6 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 52 L |