2005 GMC Canyon vs. 2013 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2013 Honda CR-V is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Honda CR-V (182 HP) has 7 more horse power than 2005 GMC Canyon. (175 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Canyon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Canyon weights approximately 196 kg more than 2013 Honda CR-V.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Canyon (252 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Honda CR-V. (221 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Canyon | 2013 Honda CR-V | |
Make | GMC | Honda |
Model | Canyon | CR-V |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 2354 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 182 HP |
Torque | 252 Nm | 221 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 99 mm |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1797 kg | 1601 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1654 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 6.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 9.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 58 L |