2005 GMC Canyon vs. 2013 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2013 Honda CR-Z is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Canyon (175 HP) has 55 more horse power than 2013 Honda CR-Z. (120 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 2013 Honda CR-Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Canyon weights approximately 601 kg more than 2013 Honda CR-Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Canyon (252 Nm) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Honda CR-Z. (174 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Honda CR-Z.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 GMC Canyon | 2013 Honda CR-Z | |
| Make | GMC | Honda |
| Model | Canyon | CR-Z |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2770 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 120 HP |
| Torque | 252 Nm | 174 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 73 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 89 mm |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1797 kg | 1196 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4079 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1394 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2435 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 5.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 40 L |
