2005 GMC Canyon vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 6,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C (445 HP) has 270 more horse power than 2005 GMC Canyon. (175 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Canyon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Canyon weights approximately 67 kg more than 2013 Mercedes-Benz C.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C (601 Nm) has 349 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 GMC Canyon. (252 Nm). This means 2013 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Canyon | 2013 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | GMC | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Canyon | C |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 6300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 445 HP |
Torque | 252 Nm | 601 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 94 mm |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1797 kg | 1730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4707 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1997 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1406 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.7 L/100km | 10.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 16.1 L/100km |