2005 GMC Canyon vs. 2013 Scion FR-S
To start off, 2013 Scion FR-S is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Scion FR-S (199 HP) has 24 more horse power than 2005 GMC Canyon. (175 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Scion FR-S should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Canyon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Canyon weights approximately 567 kg more than 2013 Scion FR-S.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Canyon (252 Nm) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Scion FR-S. (205 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Scion FR-S.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Canyon | 2013 Scion FR-S | |
Make | GMC | Scion |
Model | Canyon | FR-S |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 199 HP |
Torque | 252 Nm | 205 Nm |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1797 kg | 1230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1775 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1285 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 50 L |