2005 GMC Envoy vs. 2013 Infiniti G
To start off, 2013 Infiniti G is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Envoy. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Envoy would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 GMC Envoy is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Infiniti G (343 HP) has 68 more horse power than 2005 GMC Envoy. (275 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Infiniti G should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Envoy. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Envoy weights approximately 248 kg more than 2013 Infiniti G.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Infiniti G (374 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 GMC Envoy. (373 Nm). This means 2013 Infiniti G will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 GMC Envoy.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Envoy | 2013 Infiniti G | |
Make | GMC | Infiniti |
Model | Envoy | G |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 3696 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 343 HP |
Torque | 373 Nm | 374 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 86 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1961 kg | 1713 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1823 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1406 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 11 L/100km |