2005 GMC Envoy vs. 2013 Nissan Z
To start off, 2013 Nissan Z is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Envoy. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Envoy would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 GMC Envoy is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Z (327 HP) has 52 more horse power than 2005 GMC Envoy. (275 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Z should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Envoy. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Envoy weights approximately 682 kg more than 2013 Nissan Z.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Envoy (373 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Nissan Z. (366 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Envoy will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Nissan Z.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Envoy | 2013 Nissan Z | |
Make | GMC | Nissan |
Model | Envoy | Z |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 327 HP |
Torque | 373 Nm | 366 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 11:01:00 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2175 kg | 1493 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5300 mm | 4246 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1845 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1315 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.5 L/100km | 7.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.8 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 72 L |