2005 GMC Safari vs. 1952 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 2005 GMC Safari is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Safari (190 HP) has 131 more horse power than 1952 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Safari should accelerate faster than 1952 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Safari weights approximately 638 kg more than 1952 Jeep CJ3A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 GMC Safari. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Safari (339 Nm) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Jeep CJ3A. (145 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Jeep CJ3A.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Safari | 1952 Jeep CJ3A | |
Make | GMC | Jeep |
Model | Safari | CJ3A |
Year Released | 2005 | 1952 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 145 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1748 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2040 mm |