2005 GMC Safari vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2005 GMC Safari is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Safari (190 HP) has 131 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Safari should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Safari weights approximately 1176 kg more than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 GMC Safari is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 GMC Safari will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Safari (339 Nm) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (96 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Safari | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | GMC | Nissan |
Model | Safari | Pulsar |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 1270 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 96 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2041 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2420 mm |