2005 GMC Safari vs. 1996 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2005 GMC Safari is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-7 (238 HP) has 48 more horse power than 2005 GMC Safari. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Safari weights approximately 739 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-7.
Because 2005 GMC Safari is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mazda RX-7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 GMC Safari will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Safari (339 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda RX-7. (296 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Safari | 1996 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | GMC | Mazda |
Model | Safari | RX-7 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Body Type | Van | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 238 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 296 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2041 kg | 1302 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 77 L |