2005 GMC Safari vs. 2002 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2005 GMC Safari is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Compass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Compass would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Compass (210 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2005 GMC Safari. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Safari weights approximately 549 kg more than 2002 Jeep Compass.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Safari (339 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jeep Compass. (319 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jeep Compass.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Safari | 2002 Jeep Compass | |
Make | GMC | Jeep |
Model | Safari | Compass |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Body Type | Van | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 1406 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2660 mm |