2005 GMC Safari vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2005 GMC Safari is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda Tribute. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda Tribute would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (201 HP) has 11 more horse power than 2005 GMC Safari. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Safari weights approximately 419 kg more than 2004 Mazda Tribute.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Safari (339 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda Tribute. (266 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Safari | 2004 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | GMC | Mazda |
Model | Safari | Tribute |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 201 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 266 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102.1 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1925 kg | 1506 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 12.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 11.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 62 L |