2005 GMC Safari vs. 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara
To start off, 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Safari would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Safari (190 HP) has 19 more horse power than 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara. (171 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Safari should accelerate faster than 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Safari (339 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara. (231 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Safari | 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara | |
Make | GMC | Suzuki |
Model | Safari | Grand Vitara |
Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 2734 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 171 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 231 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.8 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 66 L |