2005 GMC Safari vs. 2010 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2010 Dodge Ram is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Safari would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Ram (345 HP) has 155 more horse power than 2005 GMC Safari. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Safari weights approximately 350 kg more than 2010 Dodge Ram.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Ram (510 Nm) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 GMC Safari. (339 Nm). This means 2010 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 GMC Safari.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Safari | 2010 Dodge Ram | |
Make | GMC | Dodge |
Model | Safari | Ram |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Van | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 5654 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 345 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 510 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2041 kg | 1691 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 6350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 2000 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 4080 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.8 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 132 L |