2005 GMC Safari vs. 2010 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2010 Ford Mustang is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Safari would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Mustang (315 HP) has 125 more horse power than 2005 GMC Safari. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Safari weights approximately 438 kg more than 2010 Ford Mustang.
Because 2005 GMC Safari is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 GMC Safari will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Mustang (440 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 GMC Safari. (339 Nm). This means 2010 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 GMC Safari.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Safari | 2010 Ford Mustang | |
Make | GMC | Ford |
Model | Safari | Mustang |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 315 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 440 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2041 kg | 1603 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4778 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1425 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 14 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 17 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 61 L |